Calibrating sensors on a L2 autonomous vehicle

In this blog, I will discuss how to calibrate a suite of sensors used in a L2 autonomous prototype vehicle.

Note:
- To ensure a dataset generated from a L2 autonomous prototype, calibrate all sensors on board per each trip.

In our autonomous vehicle prototypes, we use

6 - Cameras
- we use 6 cameras
- cropped native resolution from 1600x900 to smaller images
- are in native BGR format.
- with auto-exposure with a maximum limit of 20 ms.
- use Bayer8 format for 1 byte per pixelin encoding
- 1/1.8" CMOS sensor for 12 Hz capture frequency.
- positions:
- one front center camera
- one front side mirrow camera per side
- one rear center camera
- one rear door centered camera per side

5 - Long Range RADARs
- we use 5 sensors of RADAR
- @ 13Hz capture frequency at 77 Ghz
- measures distance & velocity, independently, in one cycle
- positions:
- one front bumper center radar
- one front side mirror radar per side
- one rear door center radar per side

1 - LIDAR
- @ 20Hz capture frequency with 32 Channels
- 360 degrees - Horizontal FOV
- +/- 10 degrees to -30 degrees Vertical FOV
- range: 80m - 100m, but usuable at 70 m
- accurte: +/- 2cm
- upto 1.39 million points per second capture

Camera Calibration - Extrinsics
- use a cube-shaped object with known charuco patterns on three orthogonal planes.
- compute the transformation matrix from the camera to LIdAR by aligning the planes of the object.
- compute the camera to the ego frame transformation matrix from the LIDAR to the ego frame transformation.

note:
- the ego frame is at the rear vehicle axle's mid point.

Camera Clibartion - Intrinsics
- compute the intrinsics and the distortion parameters of the camera with a calibration board with a know set of patterns.

RADAR caliboration
- calibrate the yaw angle using a brute force approach to minimize the compensated range rates for static objects.

LIDAR calibration
- use a laseer liner to measure the relative location of the LIDAR to the ego frame.

Comments

How to use Convolution Neural Network to predict SIFT features

A feature locator is essential in all CV domain. It's the basis of the germetric transformation, epipolar geometry, to 3D mesh reconstruction. Many techniques - SIFT and other SLAM technologies, are available, but they require ideal environments to work in. To address the short comings: - sensitive to low texture environment - sensitive to low light envonrment - sensitive to high light environment (like outdoor day light with above 20k lux) - and many other issues I propose a CNN based neural network to detect 4 correspondences in an image A and an image B. Since it is tricky to have a neural network to predict a 4x4 affine matrix of rotation and translation, I separated the translation vector from the rotation vector. Basically, the ground truth data will be precalcalated with a generic SIFT with RANSAC to calculate the correspondences set P and P'. The L2 (Eucledean) distance will be used between a predicted value. They are 4 points, so an averaged will ...

How to project a camera plane A to a camera plane B

How to Create a holographic display and camcorder In the last part of the series "How to Create a Holographic Display and Camcorder", I talked about what the interest points, descriptors, and features to find the same object in two photos. In this part of the series, I'll talk about how to extract the depth of the object in two photos by calculating the disparity between the photos. In order to that, we need to construct a triangle mesh between correspondences. To construct a mesh, we will use Delaunnay triagulation. Delaunnay Triagulation - It minimizes angles of all triangles, while the sigma of triangles is maximized. The reason for the triangulation is to do a piece wise affine transformation for each triangle mapped from a projective plane A to a projective plane B. A projective plane A is of a camera projective view at time t, while a projective plane B is of a camera projective view at time t+1. (or, at t-1. It really doesn't matter)...

How to improve the traditional ASR using Connectionist Temporal Classification

The traditional Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) performs at about 85% accuracy rate. At this rate, ASR users are often frustrated with the experience with using such a system. The tradition ASR is often fragile: 1) requires extensive modification of parameters, just to make it work. 2) requires extensive understanding of a language model and a acoustic model. 3) doesn't scale well to multiple languages. 4) hyper-sensitive to speaker variants. Deep Learning on the acoustic model has been introduced, but not much of gain in the accuracy. What if, we can do a DL from end to end? Connectionist Temporal Classification (2006) introduces an idea of using FFT on the frequency of a recording of a voice command and constructs a spectrogram at 8kHz. At each spectrogram interval, a DL neural network can be assigned, individually. The basic idea is to have RNN output neurons to encode distribution over "symbols". The traditional ASR uses a phone...

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision

Search This Blog